《清史稿·艺文志》与《八千卷楼书日》著 录清代小说之比较 Qingshigao Yiwenzhi and Baqianjuanlou Shumu: A Comparative Study of Bibliographical Catalogues of Qing Dynasty Novels
Keywords:
《清史稿·艺文志》、《八千卷楼书目》、清代小说、文言小说, Qingshigao Yiwenzhi, Baqianj uanlou Shumu, Classical literary language novels of Qing Dynasty, classical novelAbstract
章钰曾提及《八千卷楼书目》是他编纂《清史稿·艺文志》的著录来源之一，因为《八千卷楼书目》收藏了许多关于清人的著述。本文拟针对《清史稿·艺文志》与《八千卷楼书目》的子部小说著录进行比较分析，探寻章钰等对《八千卷楼书目》子部小说的弃取与调整情况。《八千卷楼书目》共著录151 部小说，其中《清史稿·艺文志》弃录的占119部，采录的占35 部，其中的22部同列入小说家，另外的12部，两者的分类不同，或者列入小说家，或者列入杂家、传记。由此，可以看出两家子部小说著录的差异，并尝试从文本出发，剖析著录差异的原因。
Qingshigao Yiwenzhi and Baqianjuanlou Shumu were bibliographical catalogues of Qing Dynasty novels. These catalogues are closely related. This paper is a comparative study of classical language novels of the Qing Dynasty as recorded in Qingshigao Yiwenzhi and Baqianjuanlou Shumu. Baqianjuanlou Shumu is a catalogue of 151 classical language novels, while Qingshigao Yiwenzhi includes 35 of the list in Baqianjuanlou Shumu. Both then display discrepancies on the categorization of published materials. This paper will examine the reasons behind these discrepancies.
